Introduction:
In today’s societies where education is widely considered as a prominent factor to contribute to the development of a community, of a country, or of the world as a whole, there are many ways by which people can acquire and keep accumulating new knowledge—from watching award-winning, well-informative documentaries on TV to listening to daily news, both national and international, on the radio. And as the world is globalizing and as modernity and modernization start affecting more and more societies, new ways of getting knowledge nowadays go beyond just TV and radio. There is now the internet, by which human beings can watch, listen, write, read and do many other things to get all the updated information. Despite such varieties, reading has always been one of the most effective means through which learning to improve general knowledge and/or sharpen any knowledge and specific skills can always be done.
In fact, it is not just about knowledge acquisition for which reading is used as a tool. According to a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Francisco, CA, April 18-22, 1995) by Otter, Martha S.:
Reading is rightly considered to be very important. Personal development, social and cultural participation, participation in education and professional development all benefits from a good level of proficiency in reading comprehension. Besides its value for individual purposes, literacy also plays a crucial role at a social level in keeping, transmitting and further developing of knowledge and cultural expressions (page 3).
However, in Cambodian contexts, it is often heard that, compared to people in some other countries who have somehow understood the importance of reading better and thus implement it more seriously and more vigorously, Cambodian people read a lot less. But what are the reasons behind this; why do Cambodian students read less in spite of the massive benefits reading can bring about? With this in question, reading was selected as a topic under which this research was to be conducted.
To be more specific, the topic of this research is defined under two controlling components:
- Reading for pleasure: As the researchers believe that one of the biggest reasons of ones not reading so much is because they find reading not so enjoyable as some other activities, such as watching TV or listening to music, this research will centre on for-pleasure reading, especially. Reading for pleasure take a more specific path in a way that it refers to activities of reading that readers find enjoyable and would happily do, rather than ones that readers see as more of an obligation. In short, reading for pleasure, for the purpose of this survey, is specified as how much time and how often undergraduate students in Cambodia take joy in reading.
- Undergraduate students at the Paññāsāstra University of Cambodia: This study targets at only those who are currently students at the Paññāsāstra University of Cambodia (PUC), where one of the things found quite noticeable is that big, thick books are attached to each course students take. With such number of books assigned, the researchers are curious to find out if the reading habit of students there conforms to the amount of the assignment.
Therefore, the mini-research aims to examine how much PUC undergraduate students read, to see whether they read as much as it is evident by the numbers of big books they carry daily. With the information received, the researchers hope to be able to construct the overall pictures of the reading behaviour of the students and explore how reading and reading for pleasure, in particular, are perceived among them. Ultimately, the assumption made earlier about Cambodian students not reading much is put into test for its reliability and rightness.
Literature Review:
People can actually go in any direction when it comes to exploring and accumulating new knowledge and ideas, one of which is through the means of reading. However, it is not just about gaining new knowledge that reading can do; “reading is a necessity,” which is essential for both school and life (for example, reading enables readers to gather information and make important decisions, making it easier for people to adapt to rapidly-changing demands and other changes) (Teaneck, 2008).
Unfortunately, many students are not showing their appreciation with a good habit of reading. According to a study conducted among Emirati students by Celine Kamhieh of Zayed University, it has been revealed that most university students do not read when they are free (Kamhieh, 2007). It is a similar story for Turkish students in the Ankara University, 46 percent of whom, based on the study by Hüseyin Odabaş and Coşkun Polat, assistant professors from Erzurum’s Atatürk University information and document management department, read the maximum of 5 books a year, while 4.5 percent had confessed not reading at all (Study reveals).
Compared to these two groups of people, for Cambodian university students their habits of reading may be relatively not very different. In an abstract found on CamTESOL.org, Mr Kruy Virak and Ms Cecilia Johnson were quoted as saying that “Traditionally, most Cambodians don’t have a habit of reading” (Abstract: Parallel sessions.) Nevertheless, there has not been any profound research to find out and determine if the claim about many Cambodian university students not having a habit of reading is true yet.
This research will basically look at the habits, the behaviour and the attitude of a sample of students at the Paññāsāstra University of Cambodia to see if it is really a correct proposition that many Cambodian university students are not reading much. Related matters, such as determinants of students’ existing reading habits plus their perceptions about reading, especially, for pleasure, will also be thrown into focus.
Research Questions
RQ1: To what extent do PUC students read for pleasure?
RQ2: To what extent do they perceive reading for pleasure as important?
RQ3: What are the perceived causes of the amount of leisure reading among them?
Methods
For this study to serve its purpose of looking into PUC undergraduate students’ perception and behavior towards leisure-time reading, participation from the students themselves is indispensable. For that, plus time constraint and resource availability, a self-completion questionnaire was seen as the best tool for data collection and was, therefore, designed for distribution among a number of bachelor’s degree students at PUC.
The questionnaire, a combination of open-ended and closed-ended questions, was constructed through a number of stages. First, all items to be included in the questionnaire were brainstormed and narrowed down to a number of points that are relevant and responsive to the 3 research questions. The brainstorming was followed by ten people being asked to complete the questionnaire, which was used as a piloting tool so that comments and feedbacks could be considered for a better questionnaire before the final ones could be ready to be distributed among the actual sample. After all, the questionnaire comes out in a four-page format containing 16 questions, which can be categorized into four different types. Type one is to ask about respondents’ attribute information, including their sex, age, and university major. Type two asks for the student’s reading habits, while questions in type 3 are intended to explore their opinions and attitudes towards reading. The last 4 questions are open-ended questions, which are cited as optional so that the respondents that find the whole questionnaire too long do not have to give additional opinions of theirs if they do not want to.
Besides, with the population of the study as the current undergraduate students at PUC, two main sampling methods were adopted. Since most classes at PUC are not homogeneous but so diverse with students from different year levels and different majors, accidental/adhoc sampling and snowball sampling were viewed as the most appropriate. The first method, accidental/adhoc sampling, worked very well in favour of the limited time the researchers had for the study. That is, the researchers had the questionnaires completed by some friends/classmates of theirs. With that same method, the researchers have, for a few times during the distribution period, stayed at certain places at the university and asked some of the people who happened to be there spontaneously to complete the survey form. Another method, the snowball sampling, was put into use in a way that the researchers gave some of the questionnaires to a few people they know, expecting each to help further distribute them to a number of people they know.
With these two sampling methods described above, 175 copies of questionnaires were handed out – 70 to student in the morning shift, 70 in the afternoon shift, and 35 in the evening shift – over the course of 3 days (May 19 to 21, 2009). Although quite a number of questionnaires were collected immediately after the respondents having filled in all the needed information, because some asked to keep the questionnaires overnight, the response rate was just moderately high, which was only 80 per cent (141 questionnaires returned).
Findings
With 141 questionnaires completed and returned, the researchers started to piece together the information and analyze the data. According to Figure 1, the respondents’ age ranges in between 18 and 30, but the majority of the population (92%) is between 18 and 24 years old. In term of sex, there are 78 males and 63 females. Besides, the group that makes up more than 50 per cent of the research population (60%) is year-2 students (85 out of 141), studying business administration, international relation, English, finance and banking, and so on (the majors are put in the order of frequencies from the highest to the lowest).
Figure 1:
Age | Sex | Year level |
| Male | female | Year1 | Year 2 | Year3 |
18 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
19 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 0 |
20 | 6 | 15 | 2 | 16 | 3 |
21 | 19 | 20 | 6 | 24 | 9 |
22 | 18 | 10 | 5 | 18 | 5 |
23 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
24 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
25 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
26 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
27 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
30 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Total | 78 | 63 | 23 | 85 | 33 |
As the result of our research, we found out that people do many activities in their free time. Among those many activities, (Figure 2) watching TV stands out as the most popular past-time activities (with 79.4 % of the respondent saying yes to it), which is followed by listening to music (76.6%). Surprisingly, but in a good way, reading books comes next after the TV watching and listening to music; 63.8 % of the population chose reading books as one of the activities they do during their free time.
Figure 2: Free time activities
Free time activities | Frequency | Percent (%) |
Reading books | 90 | 63.8 |
Reading magazines | 51 | 36.2 |
Reading newspaper | 53 | 37.6 |
Sleeping/resting/relaxing | 74 | 52.5 |
Watching TV, movies | 112 | 79.4 |
Listening to music | 108 | 76.6 |
Playing games | 43 | 30.5 |
Going out with family/friends | 73 | 51.8 |
Surfing the internet | 60 | 42.5 |
Emailing &/ chatting | 42 | 29.8 |
Playing sports | 38 | 26.9 |
Others | 7 | 4.9 |
About the amount of time spent for each time’s reading, it varies from respondents to respondents. The quantity of time spent is between 15 to 240 minutes per day, but the majority (81%) use between 30 minutes and 120 minutes (as you can see in Figure 3). However, the largest population spends 60 minutes a day for reading (about 30%).
Figure 3: Average time spent on reading
Time ( in minutes) | 15 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 45 | 60 | 75 | 90 | 110 | 120 | 150 | 180 | 210 | 240 |
Frequency | 7 | 3 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 43 | 1 | 28 | 1 | 18 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 2 |
Percent | 5.0 | 2.1 | 15.6 | .7 | .7 | 30.5 | .7 | 19.9 | .7 | 12.8 | 2.8 | 4.3 | 2.8 | 1.4 |
In research question number 3 (Figure 4), the researcher aims to discover the reasons why students read. The findings show that most of the students agree that reading helps them a lot, especially in terms of improving their general reading ability. Reading can also enable them to understand different cultures, broaden their general knowledge and benefit their study at the university, as books provide a good source of various kinds of information.
On the other hand, on the negative notes, some other respondents describe reading as affecting their eye sight and studying time and as making them feel stressful. Moreover, they agree that reading take away the time they could otherwise use for meeting with their family and friends.
Figure 4: Perception of reading for pleasure
However, no matter important the majority of students perceive reading, many still do not read much, due to some perceived causes; Figure 5 tells about those causes of people failing to build up a good habit of reading for pleasure. 81.60 percent of the respondents say that books are too difficult to read in terms of language use and complexity of contents, mainly as many good books are in English. The next biggest reason is the fact that 63.80 % find watching TV and/or listening to the music more interesting, resulting in them spending more time with TV rather than with books. Further, some say they have no time and/or are lazy to read.
It is also interesting that only few (4.3 %) do not read because they think reading is not so important. 11.30 %, moreover, say they do not like reading at all, finding it is boring.
Figure 5: Reason why people don’t read
Discussion
The data presented in this study is both interesting and surprising. What we had expected was mostly wide of the mark and it turns out that the result is much better. Indeed, at first glance, PUC students are always busy with their courses, especially reading those weighty textbooks. However, after having collected the data, the researchers found out that PUC undergraduate students tend to read a lot as well as adopt positive attitude toward reading for pleasure, according to the information collected from the questionnaires.
It is quite a remarkable, but expected discovery as the top two choices for the students’ free-time activities are watching TV/movies and listening to music. That is, besides normal classes, they are likely to spend time sitting on the comfortable sofa and enjoy their time in front the TV set and/or with headphones. Nevertheless, reading books comes at number three, which is amazing in a way. Accordingly, a conclusion that the students might read at home or come to the library and school campuses on Friday, Saturday and Sunday, which are the days PUC students do not have regular classes. Another problem that can be seen in the study is that half of the respondents chose to sleep, relax or rest, rather than read. This means that a lot of them tend to spend their time idly in their free-time. Lastly, reading newspapers and magazines show little popularity among the students though they both are very good sources for getting to know the society and improving the general knowledge.
Another fascinating aspect of our study is that nearly all of our respondents have a very positive perception of reading for pleasure. In the first place we thought that reading might appear boring to a lot of students, but, in fact, almost a hundred percent of them chose to say that reading for pleasure can improve their general reading ability and help them to understand different cultures. Moreover, around 90% agree that reading for pleasure does benefit their study and broaden their general understanding of the society. In this regard, one can assume that PUC students do not just take reading for granted; they really understand the values of reading for pleasure. Furthermore, many students also believe that reading for pleasure is really beneficial for those who study the second language, especially English, because, generally, most books are written in English. Some students also claim that reading for pleasure can make them happy (71.6%) and keep them updated (83.7%). So it is not only for the reason of boosting their academic performance but also for making themselves feel good or up-to-date.
It is a great finding that nearly 90% of students agree that reading for pleasure is important. In contrast, reading for pleasure is also shown by the study to pose problems for a minority of the sample. 2 out of 10 people say that their eyesight is affected so they, most of the time, can only read for a very short period of time. In addition to that, about 15% of all the respondents argue that reading for pleasure can affect their study time as well as their time with their friends. As such, these students tend to read less often than others.
The fact that some students at PUC don’t read should be better explained by the following reasons. The most striking information we got is that over 80% say that books are difficult to read in terms of the contents and the language use in the books. If this is true, it is really problematic for most Cambodian university students because they might as well do something else as they find it difficult to bear with the difficult books they read. What is most disturbing is the fact that for 6 out of 10 students, watching TV/movies is more appealing than reading. As a result, these students would love to watch TV/movies rather than to read for pleasure. The next barrier that hinders students from reading is the unavailability of books in Khmer. They say that some English-written books are difficult to understand as their English is still limited and they add that it would be much better if there are more books written in Khmer.
As undergraduate students at PUC are required to read many books, some of them (42.6%) say that they do not have enough time to read. Other factors that hold them back from reading include: laziness, sleepiness, no interesting books, book price, the attractiveness (pictures and color), and influences from their peers.
However, because the research sample is only 141 and the questionnaires were distributed only among PUC undergraduate students, these results may not well represent the whole population of the Cambodian students in general. PUC is quite an expensive university, with which thick text books are assigned to most courses – the fact that might be quite contrary to the lifestyles of students in most universities in the country, some of which are a lot less expensive and have students from less affluent families, for example. With limitation on time and resources, this is the flaw, no matter how impressive the findings are, that the researchers have to admit.
Conclusion:
To conclude, it can be inferred from this mini-research that PUC students tend to read a lot more than what had been previously expected by the researchers. It turns out that besides heavy tasks assigned at school, students still find their ways to read for pleasure. This suggests that no matter how difficult reading for pleasure is, PUC students are still fond of it for many down-to-earth reasons. Whilst it is common to find that TV/movies and music are so much popular among students, it is both astounding and pleasant to find out that reading books come third.
References
Abstract: Parallel sessions. (2005). Retrieved March 16, 2009, from http://www.camtesol.org/2005conference/parallel_session.html
Kamhieh, C. (2007). The factors that affect the free reading habits in English of female Emirati students. Retrieved March 16, 2009, from http://www.zu.ac.ae/research/aspx/readinghabits.aspx
Otter, M. S. (1995). Relationships between reading achievement and leisure-time reading in grade 3, 4, 5, and 6: A longitudinal study in the Netherlands. paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Study reveals poor reading habits among university students. (2009, February 26). Retrieved March 16, 2009, from Today’s Zaman web site: http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=168037